Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Mining Investor and U.S. Congressman James Gunn [otd 03/06]

Populist Congressman James Gunn was born March 6, 1843 in Ireland. The family emigrated to the U. S. between 1844 and 1846 and eventually settled in Wisconsin. James extended his education beyond the common schools at an academy in Indiana, and then taught school himself. He began to read law in Wisconsin but, in 1862, joined the Union Army as an infantryman.
Siege of Vicksburg, Kurz and Allison painting.
Library of Congress.

During his service, he participated in the siege of Vicksburg and was then transferred to units serving around the Gulf of Mexico. There, he participated in the August 1864 attack that captured the forts protecting Mobile Bay. By the end of the war, he had been promoted to Captain.

After his discharge in late 1865, Gunn followed the rush to Colorado, and soon found himself in Georgetown, which served substantial silver mines in the area. He was the town’s mayor for several years, but moved on to Virginia City, Nevada in 1875. From there, he also explored opportunities across the border in California.

When the Wood River silver discoveries got rolling in 1881-1882 [blog, Apr 26], Gunn relocated to Hailey, Idaho. Along with other ventures, he apparently helped organize, and then edited a weekly newspaper there. In 1890, Alturas County voters elected him to the first session of the Idaho state Senate.

An active member of the Republican Party, Gunn found himself put “between a rock and a hard place” by national events in 1892.

The national party decisively rejected the so-called “free silver” position, backing instead the gold standard. A full discussion is beyond the scope of this article, but “free silver” appealed to debtors of all kinds, farmers (who were usually in debt, and also believed it would improve crop prices), and – obviously – silver producers.

With an economy based largely on agriculture and silver mining, Idaho heavily supported the position. Gunn chose to leave the Republican Party and helped organize the state’s Populist Party. His first two tries for a seat in the U. S. Congress – in 1892 and 1894 – failed.

William Jennings Bryan.
Library of Congress.
For the 1896 campaign, which included a Presidential election, Idaho Populists and Democrats posted a "fusion" ticket. The fusion slate favored Democratic hopeful Williams Jennings Bryan rather than the Populist Presidential candidate. At the Populist national convention, Gunn told the leadership that "Idaho Populists would vote solidly for Bryan and carry the state for him."

That indeed proved to be the case: Bryan out-polled the Republican candidate 23,135 to 6,314 in Idaho. He still lost the election nationally. Gunn, however, succeeded in his bid for a seat in the U. S. House of Representatives. He was, in fact, one of only about 40 Populists elected to the House over six elections from 1891 through 1902.

With Populist strength already waning, Gunn lost his 1898 re-election bid and never held any further elective office. He died in Boise in 1911.
                                                                                 
References: [Brit], [Hawley], [Illust-State]
Biographical Directory of the United States Congress, online.
"Populist Convention Coverage," Milwaukee Journal (July 21, 1896).

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

National Forest Oversight Transfered from Department of Interior to Agriculture [otd 02/01]

On February 1, 1905, President Theodore Roosevelt signed the Act that transferred responsibility for America’s national forests from the Department of Interior to the Department of Agriculture. The move resolved an issue that had roots that ran back more than a century.

U.S. Navy shipyard. Library of Congress.
When the U.S. became a new country, it had custody of vast expanses of land. At first only a tiny fraction of this acreage was held out of the “public domain” – the Federal government reserved some tracts of forest to insure supplies for naval shipbuilding

The Louisiana Purchase [blog, Oct 1] expanded the nation even more. Thus, in 1812, Congress authorized creation of the General Land Office to oversee the public domain. Under their auspices, huge amounts of land were sold outright to private interests, providing a steady revenue source for the government. In 1849, Congress created the Cabinet-level Department of the Interior, and made the Land Office part of it.

Of course, land sold to settlers became private property … and mostly farms. In 1862, Congress addressed the needs of this large agrarian constituency by authorizing an independent Department of Agriculture. The Department attained Cabinet-level status in 1889.

However, the early legal structure did not view timber utilization as part of farming. Not until 1881 did Agriculture even have a Division of Forestry. Of course, the public forests – over in Interior – were not part of their job. The Division’s foresters, along with responsible private lumbering interests, could only watch in horror as hit-and-run timber pirates, and private landowners, pillaged the public timberlands.

Finally, in 1891, Congress authorized the President to set aside forest reserves, where usage would be restricted and policed. Many reserves were quickly established, but a serious problem remained: The reserves were still public lands, and therefore under the General Land Office. Unfortunately, the Department of Interior had essentially no professional foresters of its own.

Only Agriculture’s Division of Forestry had such expertise, which they had developed to support the private timber industry. Thus, Interior “borrowed” experts from the Division, but that was not a viable long-term answer. Private interests as well as the academic community urged the government to transfer those duties to where the experts already existed.

Gifford Pinchot. Library of Congress.
Finally, as noted above, President Roosevelt made the necessary change. (The bureaucratic and political ins-and-outs of this history cannot be detailed in this short essay - see the Steen reference.)

Under the leadership of professional forester Gifford Pinchot, the Division, soon to be renamed the U. S. Forest Service, made great strides in managing and protecting our national forests.

Their approaches would become models for how Federal agencies handle various classes of public lands. This is clearly relevant to Idaho: About 60% of the state’s area belongs to the Federal government and is administered by the Forest Service or the U.S. Bureau of Land Management.
                                                                                 
References: [Brit], [French]
Harold K. Steen, The U S. Forest Service: A History, University of Washington Press (1976).

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Jerome Real Estate Developer and Banker Richard Traill [otd 01/19]

Jerome developer Richard H. Traill was born on January 19, 1858 in Belleville, Canada, about 110 miles east of Toronto. He attended the Ontario College of Pharmacy in Toronto, graduating in 1876. Traill immediately moved to Chicago, where he operated drug stores in and around the city for over thirty years.
Drug store, ca 1905. Library of Congress.

Then recurring illness led him to look toward the West in hopes of finding a more healthful environment. Naturally, he also looked for favorable business prospects. At about the same time, the "North Side Tract" opened in Idaho. The Tract was located on the north side of the Snake River Canyon, across from Twin Falls.

In 1907, tract developers selected town sites to serve the plots they planned to provide with water. Jerome, located roughly sixteen miles south of Shoshone, was one such site. They began selling town lots at the end of September, 1907.

Ira Perrine [blog, May 7] had been cultivating investors in Chicago at least as early as an irrigation congress held there in November 1900. Although we do not know the specific connection, Traill liquidated his Chicago assets in 1907, and invested in ranch land and other real estate in the Jerome area.

The following year, Traill became a Director of the Gooding State Bank in Jerome. The fact that water first flowed into the North Side Canal during the year surely must have given his real estate investments a major boost.

In an interview reported (March 4, 1909) in the Idaho Statesman, Boise, Traill said, “Jerome is a wonderful town. It exemplifies to a nicety the push and enterprise of the west.”
North Side Canal, Milner Dam in the background.
Library of Congress.

Appointed as an agent for the State Land Board in 1909, Traill continued in that position for the following five years or so. Coincidentally, 1909 was a banner year for Jerome: The settlement was incorporated as a village, and a branch railroad connected the town to the main Oregon Short Line tracks at Gooding.

Although his biography does not specifically mention the property, it’s possible that Traill helped finance the North Side Inn. A “mission” or “California” style hotel, developers hurried the structure to completion to provide accommodations for the surge in traffic expected with the arrival of the railroad.

For a time after 1910, Traill took an active role in running one of his ranch properties. In 1914, Idaho’s governor appointed him to represent the Jerome area at a National Farmers’ Congress held in Fort Worth Texas. However, in late 1918, he returned to the real estate business in Jerome.

In 1920, Traill represented Jerome County in the state convention of the Republican Party. That same year, he helped organize the Jerome Chamber of Commerce, and became one of its first Directors.

He later moved to Los Angeles, California to live with one of his daughters and son-in-law. He died there in June 1940.
                                                                                 
References: [French], [Hawley]
“Banking and Financial Notes: Western States,” The Bankers Magazine, Vol. 77,  (July- December, 1908).
Blair Koch, “The North Side Inn to Rise Again,” Press Release, Crossroads Point Business Center, Jerome (June 22, 2008).

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Idaho Counties and Districts Adjusted After Creation of Montana Territory [otd 12/22]

On December 22, 1864, the government of Idaho made multiple adjustments to the legislative districts and county structure of the Territory. These changes accounted for the fact that, in May, Congress had removed the region north of the Bitterroot Valley and east of the Continental Divide from the original Idaho Territory.
Original Idaho Territory with general county boundaries.
Adapted from J. H. Hawley with future borders tinted in color.

Created in 1863 [blog, Mar 4], the initial Territory included all of future Montana and Wyoming. The first Idaho Territorial legislature adjusted many of the county definitions “inherited” within the former boundaries of Washington Territory. They reduced or redefined the four counties west of the Continental and Bitteroot divides – Boise, Idaho, Nez Perces, and Shoshone – to include three new entities: Alturas, Oneida, and Owyhee counties.

That first legislature also defined ten counties to the east. However, in May 1864, most of those counties became part of the new Montana Territory, or were returned to Dakota. With all those areas removed, Idaho had to define new legislative districts, and decided to also modify the Territory’s county structure.

On December 22nd, the legislature created three more counties. By then, prospectors had discovered immensely valuable gold fields in the Boise Basin. Idaho City, the county seat of Boise County, was by far the most populous town in the Territory. However, the city’s population was in a constant state of flux as prospectors and businessmen chased the latest gold rushes around the Boise Basin.

Boise City, tiny by comparison, had a solid core of businesses that served the rapidly growing farm and ranch population of the Boise Valley. It was also the transportation and freight hub of southwest Idaho. Those economic realities promised a bright future of stability and steady growth. Thus, the legislature partitioned western sections of Boise and Idaho county to create Ada County. They made Boise City the county seat. (Just a couple days later they made it the Territorial capital.)

Idaho Territory, 1865.
Adapted from J. H. Hawley.
The legislature also created Kootenai and Latah counties up in the "Panhandle," splitting that region off from Nez Perce County. However, that legislation had no real effect since neither region had enough permanent residents to rate a local government.

Kootenai County finally received a boost when Northern Pacific Railroad tracks entered the area in 1880, followed by much new settlement. The county formally organized in 1881 and selected Rathdrum as the county seat. The seat moved to Coeur d’Alene after Bonner County was split off in 1908.

Latah County followed a much different – and rather bizarre – route. That area grew much more rapidly, and the inhabitants soon began to press for their own county offices. However, officials in Nez Perce County opposed such a move since they handled those functions (and the attendant budget). Locals finally executed a desperate ploy: Latah County has the distinction of being the only county organized by an act of the U. S. Congress (in May 1888).
                                                                      
References: [Hawley]
“Ada County,” Reference Series No. 300, Idaho State Historical Society (July 1967).
“The Creation of the Territory of Idaho,” Reference Series No. 264, Idaho State Historical Society (March 1969)

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Oregon Benefactor Dr. John McLoughlin, Sheep Rancher and Investor Robert Noble [otd 10/19]

John McLoughlin.
Oregon Historical Society.
On October 19, 1784, Dr. John McLoughlin was born in Quebec, Canada. Although trained as a physician, McLoughlin is best known first as a leader of the Hudson’s Bay Company division in the Pacific Northwest, and later officially as the “Father of Oregon.”

In 1824 McLoughlin was appointed Chief Factor in charge of operations that included fur trapping and trading in Idaho and portions of the surrounding (future) states

Despite American fur company competition, the division maintained its profitability and eventually held a virtual monopoly in the region. McLoughlin's persistent and effective opposition to American fur companies was strictly a matter of business; he was personal friends with many Americans.

By around 1840, the fur trade had waned substantially – beaver stocks had plummeted under excessive trapping pressure, and silk had replaced beaver for fashionable men’s hats.

To strengthen British claims to the “Oregon Country” (which included our Pacific Northwest states as well as British Columbia), McLoughlin and the HBC tried to encourage Canadian settlement in the region. Such efforts were soon swamped by the arrival of American pioneers traversing the Oregon Trail.

Despite the disapproval of his superiors, McLoughlin provided crucial help to newly-arrived American settlers. He settled in the Willamette Valley himself after his resignation from the Bay Company. Sadly, unscrupulous politicians manipulated the law to force forfeiture of much of his fine land holding. That injustice was not corrected until after his death in 1857 ... at least his family benefited.

Englishman Robert Noble was born on October 19, 1844. The family moved first to Canada and then to New York state. Robert arrived in Idaho in 1870 with practically nothing except his ambition and willingness to work. He first found a job operating a Snake River ferry. A year later, he became a hand on a ranch outside of Boise City. After five years of hard labor he accrued enough stake to start a small sheep operation of his own.
Robert Noble photo: H. T. French.

Amazingly, just twelve years later, a list printed in the Owyhee Avalanche newspaper (August 26, 1882) identified Noble as the leading sheep stockman in all of Owyhee county. His holdings more than doubled those of the number two man.

Less than ten years later, the DeLamar Nugget reported ( May 19, 1891) that he owned more that 50 thousand head. The article also said, “Robert Noble, Owyhee County’s big wool man has just sold ten thousand mutton sheep ...”

In 1906, in his sixties, Noble sold the ranch and moved to Boise. He then invested in a bank and accumulated much valuable real estate in the Boise Valley. According to French’s History, he provided a large part of the financing “for the construction of the Boise Valley Railroad, and electric lines from Boise to Nampa and Meridian.”

He served as manager for that business until three years before his death in November, 1914.
                                                                                                                                     
References: [French], [Hawley]
W. Kaye Lamb, “John McLoughlin,” Dictionary of Canadian Biography, John English (ed.), University of Toronto (2000).    
John McLoughlin: Father of Oregon, 50th Anniversary Exhibit, Oregon State Archives (1997).

Friday, September 16, 2011

Steamboats, Historic Newspaper Resource, OTD Revisions

The title of this item could have been “Random Thoughts,” but that would not have helped people decide if they wanted to start/keep reading. (Also bad karma for “Search Engine Optimization” – more on that in a later blog.)

A week or so ago, I received an e-mail from Bill Burley of the Snake River Sternwheeler Association, a non-profit corporation trying to restore an actual sternwheel ship. He tracked me down through my On This Day about the steamboat Shoshone, which made its first trial run on the Snake River on May 16, 1866. I have actually done several OTD items about steamers – North Idaho, as least, has a rich steamboat history. It took me awhile to respond here in my blog because I was then finalizing the proposal package for my book, and that put several other projects behind.

Li'L Millie in (Earlier) Operation. Association photo.
The Sternwheeler Association (see “Links” page above) has purchased a small steamer, called the Li’l Millie, which was previously approved to carry 43 passengers. They are seeking donations to restore the ship so they can run excursions on the Snake above Hells Canyon. In this, they are recreating another era on the Upper Snake, including operation of the steamer Norma. Stop by their web site to read more about it … and hopefully make a donation to help them out. (Umm. Wonder if Idaho had “riverboat gamblers” on its fancier steamers? Now that would be a cool re-enactment.)

The Norma, by the way, was built on the Upper Snake River in 1890-1891. The Idaho Register (Idaho Falls, March 20, 1891) reprinted an item from the Weiser Leader that said, “We learn the steamboat Norma will shortly begin making regular trips to the Seven Devils’ landing. The vessel is a masterpiece in steamboat mechanism, and during the coming year will convey a great amount of freight to and from Seven Devils.”

Things did not go well, however. “Instead of Sailing the Norma is Sold,” Owyhee Avalanche (October 24, 1891): “The steamer Norma, built in 1890 to ply upon the Snake River between Huntington bridge and the Seven Devils mining country, was sold at sheriff’s sale on Saturday last to Captain W. P. Gray, of Portland, for $4,000. [The builder could not pay his bills, so Capt. Gray bought it for one Jacob Kamm.] … What will become of the Norma we do not know positively, but from indications we believe she will be taken down the Snake into the Columbia with next year’s rise of water.” Reprinted from Weiser Signal.

Steamer Norma. Oregon Historical Society
Their guess was off on the timing; the Norma did not move down-river until 1895. The Idaho Statesman reported (June 21, 1895), “The recent trip of the little steamer Norma over the Huntington rapids of the Snake and on to Lewiston, a distance of 180 miles, is considered a remarkable feat of navigation.”

After that, the Norma operated only on the lower Snake and (possibly) on the Columbia.

That information about the Norma came from a very quick search in a new (to me) online research resource at GenealogyBank.com, which I have also added to my “Links” page. While they are a fee-based (subscription) service, their prices are not unreasonable and they seem to have an excellent database. Their search process also seems much easier and more effective than other newspaper databases I have tried. (And no, I have no financial or other personal interest in this outfit.)

I gave GenealogyBank the state, a year span (1890-1920), plus the key words “norma” and “steamboat” or “steamer” and got a half-dozen or so good “hits” in newspapers of that period. Very impressive.

After I signed up for the service, a few weeks back, I almost immediately doubled my "stock" of historic newspaper articles related to my stock-raising book. Most of the early hits were confirmations of information I already had from other sources, but some were new.

I also found much new material for my "On This Day" blog series. Those of you who have followed that series for a long time have probably noticed that I am now "recycling" many of the older events. You have perhaps also noticed that most have been revised, with 10 to 30% new information.

With my book proposal on its way to a publisher, and the OTD cycle more into revision mode, I can start spending more time on other topics. Among those is a historical novel in the planning stage, using a lot of the information collected for the nonfiction book.

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Irish in the West : Beyond the American Pale (Book)

“Between 1845 and 1910 approximately five million people left Ireland for the United States. The vast majority of them were Catholic, desperately poor, and without the work skills that could command decent wages.” So begins the Introduction to Beyond the American Pale: The Irish in the West, 1845-1910 by David M. Emmons, Emeritus Professor of History at the University of Montana (University of Oklahoma Press, Norman: 2010).
Immigrants aboard ship for departure.
Illustrated London News (1850).*

To put that number in perspective, those emigrants came from a nation whose population peaked at about 8.5 million just before the Great Famine of the 1840s, and averaged only about 5.6 million over the time period in question.

This is a very significant text, and a monumental scholarly achievement … “The product of three decades of research and thought.” The hardback contains 350 pages of description and analysis, and over one hundred pages of supporting material. The font used, smaller than the typical paperback, allowed the publisher to cram huge amounts of information into those pages. (Full disclosure: I received this book as a free review copy.)

This book is important because typical histories of the Irish in American tend to focus on “ethnic enclaves” in the larger cities, mostly on the East coast. As Dr. Emmons says, “Historians have not paid a great deal of attention to the Irish American experience in western America.” He then briefly outlines what he thinks are the reasons for this relative neglect. Beyond the American Pale is meant to fill the resulting gap.

He next gets into the meat of his thesis: These Irish emigrants were “beyond the pale” – not just outside the mainstream of American life, but actively rejected by that society. Back then, job postings often said, “Irish need not apply.” Their Roman Catholicism was the highly-visible issue that called forth such vitriol from overwhelmingly Protestant America. Yet Emmons argues persuasively that the root cause lay in the amalgam of their religion with ancient Celtic folkways.

Building on the work of other experts, Professor Emmons says that the Irish “were premodern leftovers – communal, dependent, fatalistic, passive, traditional – attempting to make their way in a modern industrial society that was individualistic, independent, optimistic, aggressive, and innovative.”

Emmons then spends some time assessing “The West” the Irish were moving into. Actually, he describes a variety of Wests. But his emphasis on “industrial society” was the crucial element. Conventional stories of the West focused on the homesteaders and cowboys (and sheepmen) who provided grain, meat, and other foodstuffs to feed that society.

Miners in Butte Montana, many of the them Irish, ca 1908.
Credit (probably) Butte-Silver Bow Archives.*
Yet western gold, silver, copper, wood products, and so on were equally important, if not more so. Their production required large numbers of men who would do the hard, dangerous work for rock-bottom wages. There simply weren’t enough “modern” – independent, optimistic, aggressive – workers willing to fill the need. Enter the desperately poor, unskilled Irishmen, who had to take any jobs they could get. Still, while the industrial engine needed the Irish, it did not embrace them; they were still “beyond the pale.”

Emmons devotes two chapters to comparing and contrasting the Irish in America to two other groups of outsiders: black slaves and Native Americans. He discusses the variety of reasons, or excuses, that led citizens of the Northern industrialized states to view Irish Catholicism as a threat equal to that of the Southern institution of black slavery. Beyond that, it appears that blind prejudice equated incomprehensible Native American spiritual beliefs to the “superstitious” practices of the Papist emigrants.

Intertwined within that analysis, Emmons describes how emigrating to the United States showed the depth of Irish desperation. To move away from the home turf, he declared “was to be detached from community – and that was the cultural equivalent of falling off the edge of the earth. The Irish word for community was muintir; there is no adequate English translation. Na muintiri were held together by bonds of family, tradition, and shared and intensely local values.”

The fact that the emigrants faced distrust and contempt when they arrived only aggravated the problem. Their answer was entirely predictable: “They set up their parallel universe – their own schools, churches, fraternities, neighborhoods, and rookeries.”

Emmons spends some time studying that phenomenon. He concluded that “the Irish went to where the Irish were.” That is, once some Irishmen had a foothold at a particular place, or in a particular situation, others soon followed. This is a well-supported assessment. However, his discourse sometimes implies that the Irish were unique, or at least unusual in this regard, and that is somewhat problematic. Records show clearly that ties of blood and marriage – for English, as well as various ethnic groups – commonly led to family enclaves all over the West. Yet the Irish versions do seem both more broadly based within the community, and more tightly knit.

The final chapter examines the relationship between these Irish communities and the American labor movement. Being culturally and historically predisposed to resist exploitation, the Irish were often at the forefront of that movement. Yet, in Emmons’ view, militant Irish unionism was never about international socialism. The Irish community was too “intensely local” for such a strain to take root.

The chapter concludes with a discussion of the debate among the Irish in America about how far they might bend to perhaps achieve “assimilation.” The majority concluded that rampant anti-Catholicism in mainstream America made that next to impossible. It was then an article of secular faith that the West embodied America’s future. By refusing to compromise their core values, the Irish might thus have cut themselves off from that future. Instead, Emmons says, “They built their own West and their own future. Only Irish needed to apply.”
St. Mary’s Catholic Church, Butte, ca 1920.
Credit (probably) Butte-Silver Bow Archives.*
I have only one quibble, and that is not with the author. The publisher’s Product Description describes the book as “masterful yet accessible.” It is certainly masterful. The “accessible” claim is perhaps based on the author’s interweaving of selected Irish-American “folk stories” into the text. Also, the writing style is clear and crisp, and not over-loaded with academic jargon. However, his historical discussions are wide-ranging, tightly reasoned, and (sometimes) controversial. They often require close, careful study to achieve full understanding.

As just one example, consider his discussion of the “West(s)” where the Irish found themselves “beyond the pale.” Emmons calls them subregions of “The West” and says, “I count eight real ones as well as the two constructed ones.” One of the “constructed” subregions is, of course, the mythic West of story, song, and movies – he calls it the “heroic” West. Another subregion, the “Urban West,” had its own characteristics and was “the one most favored by westering Irish.” The author devotes many pages to describing these subregions, sometimes quite extensively. The explanations are fascinating and informative, but a casual perusal could miss important nuances and implications.

Beyond the American Pale is an authoritative and valuable treatise on the history of the Irish in the American West. Readers with an interest in that subject should find it well worth their time.

* Not from book, which has no illustrations other than on the dust jacket.