Frisco, ca 1897. University of Idaho Special Collections. |
Unfortunately, the great silver discoveries in the Coeur d’Alene region generally coincided with a gradual depression in silver prices. Ironically, the large production from those mines contributed to the slump. Mine owners naturally sought wage concessions, which fueled the militancy of the unions. This was, unfortunately, a period of intense labor-management strife anyway. Radical unionists faced off against equally intransigent owners, and both ignored the “voice of reason.”
The first widespread dispute in the Coeur d’Alene region occurred in July 1891. Miners were already paying monthly “hospital dues” – a health care fee. They demanded the right to designate which institution received those funds, rather than letting the companies make that decision. It does not appear they particularly distrusted the choices the owners might make, they simply wanted the freedom to choose … and they won on that issue.
Events turned more serious the following year. To offset higher freight rates imposed by the railroads, owners announced a lower wage scale for some types of workers. When the unions went out on strike, the companies imported replacements. That clash escalated to violence that resulted in the deaths of six men [blog, July 11]. Subsequent talks reached an uneasy settlement, but confrontations and intimidation continued.
As often happened, a three-way clash developed, with non-union workers (“defectors” or imports) adding to the volatile tension between union workers and company representatives.
Ore Mill, Coeur d’Alene mining district, ca 1898. Illustrated History of the State of Idaho. |
It is not known for sure why the band of kidnappers targeted Fred Whitney in 1897; he was a union member himself. As a mere foreman he had virtually no say in setting wages. The Idaho Statesman report (December 25, 1897) about the shooting said, “Whitney had only been at the mine a short time but was disliked by the men.”
Apparently a round of layoffs had followed the arrival of Whitney and a new superintendent. Rightly or wrongly, union men blamed the two, and thugs had tried to run both of them out of the country a few weeks before the attack on Whitney.
Despite $17 thousand in aggregate rewards offered, the killers were never identified. Nor was this the end of the strife: Two years later, the area experienced yet more violence [blog, Apr 29].
References: [B&W], [Illust-North], [Illust-State]
(Forwarded from John Wood) - ..."I think this story as written generally took a neutral tone between the two sides (which is good), but one word used "thugs" clearly was not neutral. Given the excesses on both sides one should be careful in not using "loaded" words. It's easy to offend readers, especially as there is a strong support for the miners in north Idaho. This is not in any way meant to be a negative about the main wording of the story as a whole, however. I enjoyed reading it. Thanks. Oh, by the way, the mill in the photo here was the Standard Mammoth mill just above the town of Black Bear on Canyon Creek. The locomotive at the lower left is an OR&N engine."
ReplyDelete(Reply from Marcus Rogers) - I will forward your remarks to the author of this article, Evan Filby. Indeed one should be cautious in using a loaded word like 'thugs' to describe people. That being said, it is hard to come up with another word that would not also be offensive to some. For example, 'enforcers' or other similar words would likely rile people. To be fair, there was probably a certain amount of 'thuggery' being done by people on both sides. Times were wild back then.
I try to choose my words carefully, based on a reading of the historical accounts (more often than not, wildly partisan, by the way). When "enforcers" boast about their ability to frighten their victims, and come across as enjoying their "work" (all of which apply in these cases) -- then I believe the term "thug" fits. Of course, companies hired their own bands of thugs to add "muscle" to the conventional, legitimate guard force ... so there's plenty to deplore about the situation. I invite your attention to my blog for April 29, which highlights another episode of conflict in the Coeur d'Alene mines. There, I note that there were "few 'good guys'" in what was going on.
ReplyDeleteShould have also said: Thanks! for your interest in the blog.
ReplyDelete